<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State of Internet TV (Part 1 of 2: Hardware)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iogear.com/blog/2009/06/04/the-state-of-internet-tv-part-1-of-2-hardware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iogear.com/blog/2009/06/04/the-state-of-internet-tv-part-1-of-2-hardware/</link>
	<description>Official IOGEAR Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IOGEAR &#187; Home Entertainment: Re-Loaded</title>
		<link>http://www.iogear.com/blog/2009/06/04/the-state-of-internet-tv-part-1-of-2-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-8163</link>
		<dc:creator>IOGEAR &#187; Home Entertainment: Re-Loaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iogear.com/blog/?p=221#comment-8163</guid>
		<description>[...] During this evolution nothing has really been able to control, manage or streamline how we interact with all the different devices in our living rooms – with the exception of the universal remote. But even with the universal remote, it was never easy switching from device to device. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] During this evolution nothing has really been able to control, manage or streamline how we interact with all the different devices in our living rooms – with the exception of the universal remote. But even with the universal remote, it was never easy switching from device to device. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IOGEAR &#187; Go Digital or Get Left Behind</title>
		<link>http://www.iogear.com/blog/2009/06/04/the-state-of-internet-tv-part-1-of-2-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-6358</link>
		<dc:creator>IOGEAR &#187; Go Digital or Get Left Behind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iogear.com/blog/?p=221#comment-6358</guid>
		<description>[...] The State of Internet TV is changing, evolving and revolutionizing how we access, view and enjoy content and media. Best of all, must of us already have a computer and broadband internet, so only a small investment is needed to enjoy the content on a larger TV with the ease and simplicity of being wireless. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The State of Internet TV is changing, evolving and revolutionizing how we access, view and enjoy content and media. Best of all, must of us already have a computer and broadband internet, so only a small investment is needed to enjoy the content on a larger TV with the ease and simplicity of being wireless. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IOGEAR &#187; The State of Internet TV (Part 2 of 2: Content)</title>
		<link>http://www.iogear.com/blog/2009/06/04/the-state-of-internet-tv-part-1-of-2-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-5604</link>
		<dc:creator>IOGEAR &#187; The State of Internet TV (Part 2 of 2: Content)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iogear.com/blog/?p=221#comment-5604</guid>
		<description>[...] You can view part one here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can view part one here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily Li</title>
		<link>http://www.iogear.com/blog/2009/06/04/the-state-of-internet-tv-part-1-of-2-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-5586</link>
		<dc:creator>Lily Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iogear.com/blog/?p=221#comment-5586</guid>
		<description>One more comment is about the limitation of this product, which is hard to elimiate technically. Due to the hard requirement of 720p, it&#039;s rarely possible to go beyond 30&#039; distance and maybe the performance is even worse when it is blocked by wall. 

The data volume is huge for transferring HD video, some of the manufactures are dedicated to achieve this hard requirement, but it&#039;s either too expensive to adopt or not reliable.

We have the solution for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more comment is about the limitation of this product, which is hard to elimiate technically. Due to the hard requirement of 720p, it&#8217;s rarely possible to go beyond 30&#8242; distance and maybe the performance is even worse when it is blocked by wall. </p>
<p>The data volume is huge for transferring HD video, some of the manufactures are dedicated to achieve this hard requirement, but it&#8217;s either too expensive to adopt or not reliable.</p>
<p>We have the solution for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily Li</title>
		<link>http://www.iogear.com/blog/2009/06/04/the-state-of-internet-tv-part-1-of-2-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-5585</link>
		<dc:creator>Lily Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iogear.com/blog/?p=221#comment-5585</guid>
		<description>There are a bunch of Auido/Video transceiver products available on the market, which can send stereo audio and VGA/HD video streaming from PC to TV, with much lower price than this product. 

If the ultimate goal is to support only one extra monitor or TV, it really not worthy to invest the money. However, IOGear&#039;s Audio/Video Kit supports multiple screens simultanously connected to the PC with only one sender and multiple receivers, right?

With the ultimate goal to support future multi-media platform for home entertainment, a critical issue is urged to be resolved: although PC supports multiple displays at the same time, how about all the audio steams are conflict with each other? If we cannot separate the audio along with its correspondent video signal from others, how can we share the entertainment center among our family members?

We have the solution for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a bunch of Auido/Video transceiver products available on the market, which can send stereo audio and VGA/HD video streaming from PC to TV, with much lower price than this product. </p>
<p>If the ultimate goal is to support only one extra monitor or TV, it really not worthy to invest the money. However, IOGear&#8217;s Audio/Video Kit supports multiple screens simultanously connected to the PC with only one sender and multiple receivers, right?</p>
<p>With the ultimate goal to support future multi-media platform for home entertainment, a critical issue is urged to be resolved: although PC supports multiple displays at the same time, how about all the audio steams are conflict with each other? If we cannot separate the audio along with its correspondent video signal from others, how can we share the entertainment center among our family members?</p>
<p>We have the solution for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
